"I think I've found a track, what do you think?"

nurvus · Post by **nurvus** » Fri Aug 25, 2006 10:05 pm

any comments or opinions on this one?

http://stardustathome.ssl.berkeley.edu/ ... d=734221V1

icebike · Post by **icebike** » Sat Aug 26, 2006 1:08 am

nurvus wrote:any comments or opinions on this one?

http://stardustathome.ssl.berkeley.edu/ ... d=734221V1

All I see is surface items.

Leah · Post by **Leah** » Sat Aug 26, 2006 8:23 am

All I see are surface items also. Keep hunting!!! They are out there somewhere.

afwxgeek · Post by **afwxgeek** » Sat Aug 26, 2006 10:58 am

http://stardustathome.ssl.berkeley.edu/ ... =9929725V1

Here is what looks like a classic track hidden really well in surface clutter. It's at 280 microns to the right and 120 up from the bottom. If only the focus went down just one or two more frames then I'd know for sure. Look closely and it even has one of those tiny black spots that appear right next to a calibration track.

Here's another one that made it past the first cut. Crazy looking structure... I'd like to think it's a crater of some sort, but I'm probably wrong.

http://stardustathome.ssl.berkeley.edu/ ... =5888359V1

icebike · Post by **icebike** » Sat Aug 26, 2006 1:11 pm

afwxgeek wrote:http://stardustathome.ssl.berkeley.edu/ ... =9929725V1

Here is what looks like a classic track hidden really well in surface clutter. It's at 280 microns to the right and 120 up from the bottom. If only the focus went down just one or two more frames then I'd know for sure. Look closely and it even has one of those tiny black spots that appear right next to a calibration track.

I'm not seeing anything I would have reported. In fact I would have flagged this bad focus because surface focus is only achieved one bar from the bottom.

Also, regarding those tiny black spots that appear on calibration movies right next to the track:

I think everybody is making too much of those. Remember the cal movies were made by hand using graphics software via cut/past and resizing to make various sizes of tracks in various orientations. Its the same pseudo track replicated in many different calibration movies.

It just so happens that the source they used (a few times too many IMHO) had a spot there, and everybody makes a big deal about it.
Its a meaningless artifact of construction, not to be expected or looked for.

theguimbs · Post by **theguimbs** » Mon Aug 28, 2006 1:26 pm

I thought that one was a calibration movie, but we clicked 9/16 :

what do you think ?[/img][/url]

theguimbs · Post by **theguimbs** » Mon Aug 28, 2006 1:34 pm

i believed that it was a calibration movie, but it was a real one.
A really good candidate, i think.
What is your opinion?
http://stardustathome.ssl.berkeley.edu/ ... =2824974V1[/url]

Howie · Post by **Howie** » Mon Aug 28, 2006 1:51 pm

I AGREE FOR SURE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

HOWIE

greuti · Post by **greuti** » Mon Aug 28, 2006 2:01 pm

It would be a really good one if there wouldn't be other surface features in the same deepest focus. So I think it's tilted and not yet beneath the surface.

Howie · Post by **Howie** » Mon Aug 28, 2006 2:19 pm

greuti wrote:It would be a really good one if there wouldn't be other surface features in the same deepest focus. So I think it's tilted and not yet beneath the surface.

I would click on it, what the hey!!!
Howie

Louis Wu · Post by **Louis Wu** » Mon Aug 28, 2006 4:55 pm

theguimbs wrote:i believed that it was a calibration movie, but it was a real one.
A really good candidate, i think.
What is your opinion?
http://stardustathome.ssl.berkeley.edu/ ... =2824974V1[/url]

That's a keeper for certain!

sub212 · Post by **sub212** » Mon Aug 28, 2006 5:47 pm

This should be yet another IDP: (slightly left below centre)
http://stardustathome.ssl.berkeley.edu/ ... =4326012V1
only low hit rate of people, though. aNy opinions?

Louis Wu · Post by **Louis Wu** » Mon Aug 28, 2006 8:39 pm

sub212 wrote:This should be yet another IDP: (slightly left below centre)
http://stardustathome.ssl.berkeley.edu/ ... =4326012V1
only low hit rate of people, though. aNy opinions?

Maybe...I'd click it as an item of interest, but confidence is low that it's a track...

jsmaje · Post by **jsmaje** » Mon Aug 28, 2006 9:00 pm

Louis Wu wrote:
sub212 wrote:This should be yet another IDP: (slightly left below centre)
http://stardustathome.ssl.berkeley.edu/ ... =4326012V1
only low hit rate of people, though. aNy opinions?
Maybe...I'd click it as an item of interest, but confidence is low that it's a track...

What on earth (I use the term advisedly) are you looking at there? Can't see anything of any interest myself.

Mighty Pete · Post by **Mighty Pete** » Tue Aug 29, 2006 1:27 am

I originally posted this on the funny odd movie thread but I think I finally figured out what this one is:

192 people viewed it, I'm the only one who thinks it's odd so far, one vote, mine.

http://stardustathome.ssl.berkeley.edu/ ... =9880492V1

It's a interplanetary dust particle, a small micro meteorite, Everyone is going to say no way there is no entrance mark, No Track !.. Yes there is... It hit the glass on the other side and was travelling toward you.

People are clicking way too fast.... Ya Snooze Ya Loose..

Stardust@home

"I think I've found a track, what do you think?"

sorry

YES!

Worth a Click if I saw it!!!

IDP for sure

Re: IDP for sure

Re: IDP for sure