Where do I fit in?

This forum is for discussing space science topics related to Stardust@home.

Moderator: DustMods

How do you stand in accuracy?

0 - 9 answered inaccurately.
9
24%
10 - 49 answered inaccurately.
21
55%
50 - 99 answered inaccurately.
4
11%
100 - 199 answered inaccurately.
2
5%
200 - 499 answered inaccurately.
1
3%
More than 500 answered inaccurately.
1
3%
 
Total votes: 38

BasketCase
Posts: 11
Joined: Tue Sep 12, 2006 2:50 pm
Location: Owensboro, Kentucky

Where do I fit in?

Post by BasketCase »

Calibration Movies Answered Correctly 372
Calibration Movies Answered Incorrectly 36
Your Overall Score: 336
Total Real Movies Viewed: 1081
Your Rank: 2462 out of 15791
Specificity: 99%
Sensitivity: 85.04%

I'm curious as to how I stand in the grand scheme of things. Please take the poll and we can all compare ourselves with each other...if that matters to anyone other than me.

Thanks, Basketcase
Wolter
DustMod
Posts: 457
Joined: Mon May 22, 2006 2:23 am
Location: Enkhuizen, the Netherlands

Post by Wolter »

Calibration Movies Answered Correctly 2773
Calibration Movies Answered Incorrectly 27
Your Overall Score: 2746
Total Real Movies Viewed: 7321
Your Rank: 301 out of 15802
Specificity: 99.78%
Sensitivity: 98.36%

And the majority of the incorrect answers where during the first 500 calib. movies.
Just dusting... Image
GelDelve

Post by GelDelve »

Calibration Movies Answered Correctly 3491
Calibration Movies Answered Incorrectly 28
Your Overall Score: 3463
Total Real Movies Viewed: 8807
Your Rank: 221 out of 15816
Specificity: 99.71%
Sensitivity: 98.71%

In the initial phase of this endeavor that I have no idea or way to reconstruct, I had 22 calibrations that showed as incorrect. Since then I've had 6 more, at least one of which I am sure was erroneously counted as incorrect.
xxxxxy
Posts: 166
Joined: Sat Aug 26, 2006 2:11 pm
Location: Slovenia
Contact:

Post by xxxxxy »

Calibration Movies Answered Correctly 6382
Calibration Movies Answered Incorrectly 33
Your Overall Score: 6349
Total Real Movies Viewed: 16494
Your Rank: 101 out of 15825
Specificity: 99.74%
Sensitivity: 99.26%

90% od incorrect answers I made during first day of search (first 8 hours).
Mississauga
Posts: 13
Joined: Tue Aug 08, 2006 5:39 pm
Location: Ontario, Canada

Post by Mississauga »

Calibration Movies Answered Correctly 10091
Calibration Movies Answered Incorrectly 91
Your Overall Score: 10000
Total Real Movies Viewed: 29396
Your Rank: 48 out of 15972
Specificity: 99.92%
Sensitivity: 98.29%

... and waiting for the rest of the top 100 to catch up. :wink:
- alec -

MDD DP 867, iBook G4/1.33, iMac G5/1.8
jsmaje
Posts: 616
Joined: Tue Aug 15, 2006 8:39 am
Location: Manchester UK

Post by jsmaje »

Mississauga wrote:Calibration Movies Answered Correctly 10091
Calibration Movies Answered Incorrectly 91
Your Overall Score: 10000
Total Real Movies Viewed: 29396
Your Rank: 48 out of 15972
Specificity: 99.92%
Sensitivity: 98.29%

... and waiting for the rest of the top 100 to catch up. :wink:
How can you possibly do that (alone) - are you at it all day, every day?
I really admire your enthusiasm. I just hope you've got a life outside stardust !! :lol:
Mississauga
Posts: 13
Joined: Tue Aug 08, 2006 5:39 pm
Location: Ontario, Canada

Post by Mississauga »

jsmaje wrote:How can you possibly do that (alone) - are you at it all day, every day?
I really admire your enthusiasm. I just hope you've got a life outside stardust !! :lol:
I did spend an excessive amount of time to get to that score. My lifestyle allowed it for a short while, but reality caught up and I put the "addiction" aside for now. :wink:
- alec -

MDD DP 867, iBook G4/1.33, iMac G5/1.8
Nikita
DustMod
Posts: 994
Joined: Wed May 17, 2006 8:33 pm
Location: Indiana, USA

Post by Nikita »

Congrats on breaking the addiction! Just remember, moderation is the key. Just think, "I can stop after this one, Well, I can stop after this next one, No, I really can stop after this last one...." :D
From dust we come
Pleiades
Posts: 4
Joined: Fri Oct 06, 2006 6:37 am

Post by Pleiades »

Finally found something to break my obsession with Freecell! :D

Calibration Movies Answered Correctly 768
Calibration Movies Answered Incorrectly 3

Specificity: 99.73%
Sensitivity 99.50%

Now how to break my obsession with Stardust? :evil:
Mighty Pete
Posts: 146
Joined: Thu Aug 10, 2006 7:47 am
Contact:

Post by Mighty Pete »

Now how to break my obsession with Stardust?
Pocket lint collecting, String ball or duct tape ball.
Pleiades
Posts: 4
Joined: Fri Oct 06, 2006 6:37 am

Post by Pleiades »

Mighty Pete wrote:
Now how to break my obsession with Stardust?
Pocket lint collecting, String ball or duct tape ball.
Been there, done that. ...as well as rubber bands and AOL CDs.
Nikita
DustMod
Posts: 994
Joined: Wed May 17, 2006 8:33 pm
Location: Indiana, USA

Post by Nikita »

You know, they have medicine for that! :lol:
From dust we come
Schlockading
DustMod
Posts: 132
Joined: Thu May 18, 2006 7:20 pm
Location: Mesquite, TX

Post by Schlockading »

My stats:

Calibration Movies Answered Correctly 569
Calibration Movies Answered Incorrectly 1
Your Overall Score: 568
Total Real Movies Viewed: 1726
Your Rank: 1634 out of 16052
Specificity: 100.00%
Sensitivity: 99.67%
Image
DiamondGirl
Posts: 77
Joined: Tue Jun 13, 2006 12:16 pm
Location: Syracuse, NY

Post by DiamondGirl »

My stats below.

One interesting thing I noticed browsing through the posts - almost everyone seems to have a higher score on Specificity than on Sensitivity. I wonder if that indicates anything on an overall basis?

Mine is the opposite, with lower Specificity than Sensitivity.

Calibration Movies Answered Correctly: 2202
Calibration Movies Answered Incorrectly: 12
Your Overall Score: 2190
Total Real Movies Viewed: 5351
Your Rank: 396 out of 16052
Specificity: 99.27%
Sensitivity: 99.64%
Wolter
DustMod
Posts: 457
Joined: Mon May 22, 2006 2:23 am
Location: Enkhuizen, the Netherlands

Post by Wolter »

DiamondGirl wrote:<...>
One interesting thing I noticed browsing through the posts - almost everyone seems to have a higher score on Specificity than on Sensitivity. I wonder if that indicates anything on an overall basis?
Mine is the opposite, with lower Specificity than Sensitivity.
<...>
That means that most people miss more existing tracks then that they click non existing tracks (blank CM's), whereas you clicked on a number of non existing tracks and missed only a view existing tracks.
i.e. you have a good eye for the tiny tracks.
Just dusting... Image
Post Reply