I answered a calibration movie right but was scored wrong
Moderators: Stardust@home Team, DustMods
Got correct but marked wrong
At 6:58 PDT Got marked wrong for clicking 4198087V1 fjgiie
Next movie had - frame=33&coords=?205,146 at the end.
No misses prior to this as I had just begun.
Next movie had - frame=33&coords=?205,146 at the end.
No misses prior to this as I had just begun.
Got "dinged" (Sensitivity) for the following CM:
http://stardustathome.ssl.berkeley.edu/ ... rds=?-1,-1
I did not see any "tracks" and went back to review and still could not find one. The VM previous to that was not a CM (I believe), so I don't think the "delay" that Bryan has discussed would be likely. Anyone see what I missed?
Thanks...and Happy Dusting!!
http://stardustathome.ssl.berkeley.edu/ ... rds=?-1,-1
I did not see any "tracks" and went back to review and still could not find one. The VM previous to that was not a CM (I believe), so I don't think the "delay" that Bryan has discussed would be likely. Anyone see what I missed?
Thanks...and Happy Dusting!!
"StarDust@Home II: The Sequel - Tracking Up Close and (somewhat more) Personal"...opening this August at a browser near you!
-
- Posts: 86
- Joined: Fri Jan 26, 2007 3:24 pm
- Location: Newport Oregon
Another one that gets bad focus
I clicked at 35-231 the middle of the little square and got a positive incorrect
http://stardustathome.ssl.berkeley.edu/ ... rds=?-2,-2
http://stardustathome.ssl.berkeley.edu/ ... rds=?-2,-2
Re: Another one that gets bad focus
I had the same problem. I clicked on that track but was scored false.Star Gezzer wrote:I clicked at 35-231 the middle of the little square and got a positive incorrect
http://stardustathome.ssl.berkeley.edu/ ... rds=?-2,-2
i don't have the number of the movie, but here is a screenshot:
-
- Posts: 86
- Joined: Fri Jan 26, 2007 3:24 pm
- Location: Newport Oregon
another one that will get a bad focus
I clicked at 442-97 and received a incorect positive CM
http://stardustathome.ssl.berkeley.edu/ ... rds=?-2,-2
The next movie gave me this
http://stardustathome.ssl.berkeley.edu/ ... rds=?-2,-2
http://stardustathome.ssl.berkeley.edu/ ... rds=?-2,-2
The next movie gave me this
http://stardustathome.ssl.berkeley.edu/ ... rds=?-2,-2
-
- Posts: 86
- Joined: Fri Jan 26, 2007 3:24 pm
- Location: Newport Oregon
Here is another one
I clicked no track and received an incorrect positive CM
http://stardustathome.ssl.berkeley.edu/ ... rds=?-1,-1
The next movie showed the following. no coordinates
http://stardustathome.ssl.berkeley.edu/ ... oscope.php
http://stardustathome.ssl.berkeley.edu/ ... rds=?-1,-1
The next movie showed the following. no coordinates
http://stardustathome.ssl.berkeley.edu/ ... oscope.php
track @ 165/260cretinbob wrote:806215V1
-1,1 (no track)
0715Z
cretinbob
maybe 320/1706025657V1
-1,1 (no track)
0722Z 8/19/07
cretinbob
track @ 295/806522686V1
no track
0815Z 8-19-07
cretinbob
track 220/310572284V1
no track
825Z 8-19-2007
cretinbob
track 120/909490489V1
no track
0832Z 8-19-2007
cretinbob
maybe 215/1559599672V1
no track
0846Z 8-19-2007
cretinbob
Possible bad CM
CM 3525376V1 has 2 obvious inclusions. I clicked on one of them and it scored me as incorrect. One is in the lower left and the other is about middle right. I don't have the coordinates, but they are pretty obvious.
While these don't look like tracks, It still seemed proper to click on them. Should we not click on an inclusion, and do the CMs now score on this?
While these don't look like tracks, It still seemed proper to click on them. Should we not click on an inclusion, and do the CMs now score on this?