7016091V1
I have other movies whith far worse ratio, but allready checked, like this:
Movie 3316648V1 228 57 Not Extraterrestrial inclusion (25%)
Is this just an update issue in the my events page, or the previously 'stated fact' didn't true? (movies whith better ratio gets checked sooner)
Movie 7016091V1 has 165/103 (62%) but still Indeterminate
Moderators: Stardust@home Team, DustMods
-
- Posts: 146
- Joined: Thu Aug 10, 2006 7:47 am
- Contact:
Atus and Pete............How about these ???
http://stardustathome.ssl.berkeley.edu/ ... =2790452V1
http://stardustathome.ssl.berkeley.edu/ ... =7264138V1
http://stardustathome.ssl.berkeley.edu/ ... =5992101V1
http://stardustathome.ssl.berkeley.edu/ ... =3243518V1
http://stardustathome.ssl.berkeley.edu/ ... d=612198V1
http://stardustathome.ssl.berkeley.edu/ ... =7103337V1
All the above have large click ratios!!!
This is largest ratio I have on my list!!!
Movie 5860637V1 275 119 Indeterminate
http://stardustathome.ssl.berkeley.edu/ ... =5860637V1
http://stardustathome.ssl.berkeley.edu/ ... =7264138V1
http://stardustathome.ssl.berkeley.edu/ ... =5992101V1
http://stardustathome.ssl.berkeley.edu/ ... =3243518V1
http://stardustathome.ssl.berkeley.edu/ ... d=612198V1
http://stardustathome.ssl.berkeley.edu/ ... =7103337V1
All the above have large click ratios!!!
This is largest ratio I have on my list!!!
Movie 5860637V1 275 119 Indeterminate
http://stardustathome.ssl.berkeley.edu/ ... =5860637V1
-
- DustMod
- Posts: 694
- Joined: Wed May 17, 2006 8:12 pm
- Location: Horsetown, USA
Re: Atus and Pete............How about these ???
That seems like a gallery of inclusions. I have noticed the events with inclusions having a high ratio of clicks (1/3 to 1/2).Howie wrote:http://stardustathome.ssl.berkeley.edu/ ... =2790452V1
http://stardustathome.ssl.berkeley.edu/ ... =7264138V1
http://stardustathome.ssl.berkeley.edu/ ... =5992101V1
http://stardustathome.ssl.berkeley.edu/ ... =3243518V1
http://stardustathome.ssl.berkeley.edu/ ... d=612198V1
http://stardustathome.ssl.berkeley.edu/ ... =7103337V1
All the above have large click ratios!!!
This is largest ratio I have on my list!!!
Movie 5860637V1 275 119 Indeterminate
http://stardustathome.ssl.berkeley.edu/ ... =5860637V1
Then there are these events with amazingly low click ratios:
9 in 143
3 in 93
9 in 228
among others...
Thanks for the input...
My strategy........
The tracks that show up way beyond the movie surface, and of course I cannot go focus further,,,without saying bad focus!!!
If I click no track,,, no one will look,,,
If I click bad focus it goes back to review,,,
If you look at it you may think about it!!!
If I click it and you take a look??? Maybe it is seen???
If I don't take a chance on one to look at, maybe no one else will!!!
I click on what I think is something to look at !!!
Right or wrong!!!
The tracks that show up way beyond the movie surface, and of course I cannot go focus further,,,without saying bad focus!!!
If I click no track,,, no one will look,,,
If I click bad focus it goes back to review,,,
If you look at it you may think about it!!!
If I click it and you take a look??? Maybe it is seen???
If I don't take a chance on one to look at, maybe no one else will!!!
I click on what I think is something to look at !!!
Right or wrong!!!
-
- DustMod
- Posts: 694
- Joined: Wed May 17, 2006 8:12 pm
- Location: Horsetown, USA
Re: Thanks for the input...
That is perfectly acceptable and logical.Howie wrote:My strategy........
The tracks that show up way beyond the movie surface, and of course I cannot go focus further,,,without saying bad focus!!!
If I click no track,,, no one will look,,,
If I click bad focus it goes back to review,,,
If you look at it you may think about it!!!
If I click it and you take a look??? Maybe it is seen???
If I don't take a chance on one to look at, maybe no one else will!!!
I click on what I think is something to look at !!!
Right or wrong!!!
My point was that there are many 'inclusion' movies with high ratios that are getting looked at first because of their ranking; but others, like the three examples above, have gone unreviewed because of their low click ratio- and , in my opinion, are far more likely candidates than the oft clicked 'inclusions'.