Collection of High Angle Tracks/Low Angle Tracks

greuti · Post by **greuti** » Sat Nov 25, 2006 8:57 am

xxxxxy · Post by **xxxxxy** » Sat Nov 25, 2006 9:21 am

This movie also passed cut 1 and it is possible IDP:

http://stardustathome.ssl.berkeley.edu/ ... =1947244V1

Howie · Post by **Howie** » Sat Nov 25, 2006 9:23 am

I already Like this Thread!!!

Should turn out interesting...

I am glad to see some of the posts going toward helping the team and all us participants!!!

Howie

greuti · Post by **greuti** » Sat Nov 25, 2006 9:50 am

xxxxxy wrote:This movie also passed cut 1 and it is possible IDP:
http://stardustathome.ssl.berkeley.edu/ ... =1947244V1

But where is the possible LAT

(low angle track)? And it seems this movie reaches not even the surface focus level.

stardust1 · Post by **stardust1** » Sat Nov 25, 2006 2:52 pm

Nice collection!

greuti wrote:Is any one missing?

Those:
http://stardustathome.ssl.berkeley.edu/ ... =1728279V1
http://stardustathome.ssl.berkeley.edu/ ... =6721021V1

And maybe this one (low angle?)
http://stardustathome.ssl.berkeley.edu/ ... ?id=2666V1

stardust1.

greuti · Post by **greuti** » Sun Nov 26, 2006 12:21 am

stardust1 wrote: And maybe this one (low angle?)
http://stardustathome.ssl.berkeley.edu/ ... ?id=2666V1

Hmm, that "larger" aerogel feature, at and beneath the surface, seems to be associated with the "particle" (to me).

xxxxxy · Post by **xxxxxy** » Sun Nov 26, 2006 12:48 am

greuti wrote:
xxxxxy wrote:This movie also passed cut 1 and it is possible IDP:
http://stardustathome.ssl.berkeley.edu/ ... =1947244V1
But where is the possible LAT (low angle track)? And it seems this movie reaches not even the surface focus level.

I can not understand why you didn`t add movie 1947244V1 to your list, if is Stardust@Home Team`s opinion that this movie is IDP.

What caind of collection is then that

Collection of movies that consists IDP`s on only your opinion

greuti · Post by **greuti** » Sun Nov 26, 2006 2:05 am

Sorry, the idea of this thread was to show low angle tracks that can be identified as such. Movie 1947244V1 shows no low angle track (unlike all the others, which were probably caused by IDPs), also none out of focus. It needs another review to find out what it could be - "passed cut 1" means nothing else as "exactly" this.

More opinions regarding status of movie 1947244V1?

WorWizard · Post by **WorWizard** » Sun Nov 26, 2006 4:25 pm

If you all want. I will keep a spreadsheet and post weekly to check for duplicates.

WW

WorWizard · Post by **WorWizard** » Sun Nov 26, 2006 7:04 pm

1203103V1
1362204V1
1728279V1
1779983V1
1947244V1
2205922V1
2220548V1
2666V1
281240V1
305392V1
3758913V1
433711V1
5103315V1
5521434V1
5867437V1
6355541V1
6544999V1
670702V1
6713450V1
6721021V1
6979778V1
730481V1
7559378V1
7635058V1
7663035V1
7933874V1
8130472V1
8153179V1
8513043V1
862370V1
862370V1
8665344V1
9987464V1
9987464V1
tutorial 10

greuti · Post by **greuti** » Wed Nov 29, 2006 7:33 am

WorWizard wrote:If you all want. I will keep a spreadsheet and post weekly to check for duplicates.

Hi WorWizard,

Nice list. As I can see, you have additionally collected movies that contain features that resemble low angle tracks. Not the primary intention of this thread though, but, however it also seems to be a good idea to collect these movies containing features which can not yet be finally identified as low angle tracks.

Now my suggestion would be that you list (clickable too) additionally those movies, with suspect features, in an extra list here or in another thread. To collect and list again those movies from my list above makes less sense though.

greuti · Post by **greuti** » Sun Dec 17, 2006 9:23 am

http://stardustathome.ssl.berkeley.edu/ ... =6406644V1

Probably the same track as in movie 1728279V1.
59 people have already clicked it by 190 viewings and it got also already official comment "possible idp". Surprisingly I didn't find it in the forum so far - maybe posted anywhere in "I think I've found a track, what do you think?".

fjgiie · Post by **fjgiie** » Sun Dec 17, 2006 9:55 am

http://stardustathome.ssl.berkeley.edu/ ... ight=#8402

The two tracks could be one and the same. 1728279V1 is about three
frames deeper.

greuti · Post by **greuti** » Sun Dec 17, 2006 12:02 pm

Ah there, thanks fjgiie for searching!

If it is the adjacent movie, that huge difference between the ID numbers would be amazing.

WorWizard · Post by **WorWizard** » Sun Dec 17, 2006 8:11 pm

greuti wrote:
WorWizard wrote:If you all want. I will keep a spreadsheet and post weekly to check for duplicates.
Hi WorWizard,

Nice list. As I can see, you have additionally collected movies that contain features that resemble low angle tracks. Not the primary intention of this thread though, but, however it also seems to be a good idea to collect these movies containing features which can not yet be finally identified as low angle tracks.

Now my suggestion would be that you list (clickable too) additionally those movies, with suspect features, in an extra list here or in another thread. To collect and list again those movies from my list above makes less sense though.

Howdy,

What I did was. I took all the Low-angle ones that I could find in all of the forums (including yours) and put them into a spreadsheet. I then took the spreadsheet and sorted them a-z. then I deleted any duplicate entries. then I checked all the links. then I copied the whole thing to the forum. I guss I lost the links in the process. Sorry about that

WW

Stardust@home

Collection of High Angle Tracks/Low Angle Tracks

Collection of High Angle Tracks/Low Angle Tracks

Good Going greuti!!!

Re: Collection of Low Angle Tracks

Re: Collection of Low Angle Tracks

Keeping track of tracks

Let me see if it works

Re: Keeping track of tracks

Re: Keeping track of tracks