Page 2 of 2
Posted: Thu Oct 19, 2006 9:26 am
Wolter wrote:That means that most people miss more existing tracks then that they click non existing tracks (blank CM's), whereas you clicked on a number of non existing tracks and missed only a view existing tracks. i.e. you have a good eye for the tiny tracks.
Right. But it's interesting to see the trends in how many folks tend to be better at eliminating non tracks vs. spotting difficult ones. It looks to me from the statistics posted throughout that a good majority are better at (to paraphrase) saying NO, than they are at saying YES. Just an interesting statistical feature. Might make for a good study at some point.
Posted: Sat Feb 17, 2007 12:35 pm
Dusting off an old thread *cough cough*
Calibration Movies Answered Correctly: 4675
Calibration Movies Answered Incorrectly: 42
Your Overall Score: 4633
Total Real Movies Viewed: 12571
Your Rank: 285 out of 22683
Posted: Sun Feb 18, 2007 6:20 am
Your stats would go better in the not so dusty Post your stats
thread. However, it is nice to see that you looked through the old stuff. There is some good stuff back there, especially the "you know you are a duster" thread. Nice comments!
Posted: Sun Feb 18, 2007 8:06 am
OK, I didn't see that thread until after I posted here
Posted: Mon Mar 03, 2008 5:51 pm
Don't feel bad Basketcase my sensitivity is 90.34, but working hard to reach 100%.
Posted: Thu Mar 27, 2008 11:27 am
Zoerel wrote: Don't feel bad Basketcase my sensitivity is 90.34, but working hard to reach 100%.
Yes, i agree with you.. keep working hard to get best result..