Bad CM?

Post here if you are having any kind of problem with the Stardust@home website.

Moderators: Stardust@home Team, DustMods

Locked
S Wilson
Posts: 20
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 3:59 pm
Location: Patagonia, Chile

Bad CM?

Post by S Wilson »

I just clicked 8333767V1 as a no track and was scored as an error. I just reviewed it and can find no track. This is the second time this has happened.
Please check this out and let me know. I was hoping that the CM errors would be fixed this time around.

albutterworth
Stardust@home Team
Stardust@home Team
Posts: 69
Joined: Wed May 17, 2006 12:24 pm
Location: UC Berkeley, CA
Contact:

Post by albutterworth »

Hi

8333767V1 is a real movie. Clicking Track or No Track on a real movie will not affect your score.


-Anna
Stardust@home
Useful Links: | Aerogel Scanning Progress | Forum Rules |

S Wilson
Posts: 20
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 3:59 pm
Location: Patagonia, Chile

Post by S Wilson »

Thanks Anna for checking on that.
I can assure you that my score was affected on that movie. What could have caused it?

enokh
Posts: 54
Joined: Thu Aug 02, 2007 9:34 am
Location: Italia Reggio Emilia

Post by enokh »

Ciao a tutti, scusate per la traduzione, ma ho difficoltà nello scrivere l'inglese....
ho lo stesso problema, cliccando traccia o no traccia, il mio score mi dà errore.

translation:
Hi all, excused for the translation, but I have difficulty in writing English….
I have the same problem, clicking track or No track, my score gives error to me.

stardust1
Posts: 161
Joined: Sat Aug 05, 2006 2:08 pm
Location: Germany

Re: Bad CM?

Post by stardust1 »

S Wilson wrote:I just clicked 8333767V1 as a no track and was scored as an error. I just reviewed it and can find no track. This is the second time this has happened.
Please check this out and let me know. I was hoping that the CM errors would be fixed this time around.
Same to me on this movie:

http://stardustathome.ssl.berkeley.edu/ ... rds=?-1,-1

Although it seems to be a real movie 1902917V1 my score was affected like on a missed pos. CM, lowering my "Sensitivity" value.

[Edit 2007.08.13 17.45 UTC] Once again on "Realmovie" 3787546V1. I was scored for a missed track by clicking "no track". [/Edit]

Please let me know when this problem is fixed.

Thanks
Last edited by stardust1 on Mon Aug 13, 2007 10:59 am, edited 1 time in total.
Wir leben in einer Zeit vollkommener Mittel und verworrener Ziele. (Albert Einstein)

elainekeefe
Posts: 190
Joined: Fri Aug 04, 2006 4:38 am
Location: Massachusetts, USA

a click and a miss

Post by elainekeefe »

The following movie clearly has a picture box containing a CM about 2/3 of the way down on the left. I clicked on it and was penalized for a missed positive CM.

http://stardustathome.ssl.berkeley.edu/ ... rds=?-1,-1

stardust1
Posts: 161
Joined: Sat Aug 05, 2006 2:08 pm
Location: Germany

Wrong coordinates captured

Post by stardust1 »

I clicked the following CM at coord. 236, 257 and was scored wrong. When I went back the browsers URL indicated different coordinates than I clicked on (306, 181??).

http://stardustathome.ssl.berkeley.edu/ ... s=?306,181

I am using Windows with IE6. No magnifiers or other adds.
Wir leben in einer Zeit vollkommener Mittel und verworrener Ziele. (Albert Einstein)

Crumplestiltskin
Posts: 20
Joined: Sat Feb 03, 2007 5:41 am
Location: Durham, North Carolina

Incorrectly scored calibration movies ?

Post by Crumplestiltskin »

[Also posted on Stardust@Home Discussion]
Posted: Mon Aug 13, 2007 9:59 am Post subject: Incorrectly scored calibration movies ?

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

While it's true that some of the tracks are harder to spot and more subtle [than in Phase 1], there are a handful of CM's with supposed tracks I've viewed that scored as 'incorrectly answered' when I saw no part. tracks. I've been using the back button to re-view them and to make a list. I hope that, as in Phase 1, someone is aware of and concerned about this enough to check on possible scoring errors and make any corrections [better early on than later into the searching]. Here are a few I've encountered that I wish anyone with the power will investigate [I don't have the URL's for the 1st four]:

Movie id: 7312065V1
Movie id: 3261513V1
Movie id: 7662919V1
Movie id: 3305306V1

Movie id: 4797413V1
http://stardustathome.ssl.berkeley.edu/ ... rds=?-1,-1

Movie id: 2999095V1
http://stardustathome.ssl.berkeley.edu/ ... rds=?-1,-1

Movie id: 5002457V1
http://stardustathome.ssl.berkeley.edu/ ... rds=?-1,-1

Movie id: 416074V1
http://stardustathome.ssl.berkeley.edu/ ... rds=?-1,-1

Movie id: 8817948V1
http://stardustathome.ssl.berkeley.edu/ ... rds=?-1,-1

plus 2:
Movie id: 3379201V1
http://stardustathome.ssl.berkeley.edu/ ... rds=?-1,-1

Movie id: 60714V1
http://stardustathome.ssl.berkeley.edu/ ... rds=?-1,-1

I for one am more concerned about accuracy stats/% than my overall score. Thanks, Crumplestiltskin
_________________
SPACE IS THE PLACE !
SPACE IS THE PLACE !

stardust1
Posts: 161
Joined: Sat Aug 05, 2006 2:08 pm
Location: Germany

Post by stardust1 »

Hi Crumplestiltskin,

I second your demand for fixing obvious errors as soon as possible.

Your movies
Movie id: 5002457V1 and
Movie id: 416074V1 seem to be real movies, no CMs. If you were scored wrong, maybe this was by error like it happened to me and others (see above).

My guess to your other samples would be:
Movie id: 4797413V1 track at 55, 225
Movie id: 2999095V1 track at 320, 230
Movie id: 8817948V1 track at 370, 305
Movie id: 3379201V1 track at 30, 70
Movie id: 60714V1 track at 320, 90

Hope that helps
-stardust1
Wir leben in einer Zeit vollkommener Mittel und verworrener Ziele. (Albert Einstein)

rlcwik
Posts: 25
Joined: Sun Nov 05, 2006 11:46 am
Location: Silver City, New Mexico, USA

Post by rlcwik »

I beleive I found the same one as elainekeefe above. This is clearly a positive calibration movie and I got dinged when I clicked on it. What gives?

http://stardustathome.ssl.berkeley.edu/ ... rds=?-1,-1

rlcwik
Posts: 25
Joined: Sun Nov 05, 2006 11:46 am
Location: Silver City, New Mexico, USA

Post by rlcwik »

Okay, here is another one. This one is not as obvious as the one above, but if I ever see these two again they will be tagged as Bad Focus. I'm not going to trust my good sensitivity score to these ever again.

http://stardustathome.ssl.berkeley.edu/ ... ds=?418,88

DustBuster
DustMod
Posts: 694
Joined: Wed May 17, 2006 8:12 pm
Location: Horsetown, USA

Please post in the appropriate threads

Post by DustBuster »

Hi.

Rather than give you a link to the post, I am going to paste it here in it full:
Please report in the appropriate threads
Hello All,

Thank you all for your reports of various troubles as we launch phase 2. They are very important and helpful. If you have a report of a strange focus movie that should be brought to our attention, please use this thread: http://stardustathome.ssl.berkeley.edu/ ... .php?t=650

If you believe you have been scored incorrectly on a calibration movie, please use this thread (please read the first post in that thread before posting): http://stardustathome.ssl.berkeley.edu/ ... php?t=1094

Thank you again for your help,
-Bryan

Locked