Ratios
Moderators: Stardust@home Team, DustMods
-
- Posts: 20
- Joined: Mon Aug 07, 2006 1:02 pm
Ratios
I like that you have expaned the ratios to 2 decimal places to fix the rounding issue but..
It seems the same calculation is being used for both so each has the exact same ratio..
I missed a calibration movie that had a track and both ratios dropped by .5 %
I have answered 3354 calibration movies correct
I screwed up on 18
I have viewed 9365 real movies.
My ratios are:
Specificity: 99.05%
Sensitivity: 99.05%
It seems the same calculation is being used for both so each has the exact same ratio..
I missed a calibration movie that had a track and both ratios dropped by .5 %
I have answered 3354 calibration movies correct
I screwed up on 18
I have viewed 9365 real movies.
My ratios are:
Specificity: 99.05%
Sensitivity: 99.05%
-
- Posts: 20
- Joined: Mon Aug 07, 2006 1:02 pm
never mind
I see that is now fixed..
Thanks!!
Thanks!!
I don't see any decimal places... Maybe I haven't done enough to earn them.
My Events wrote:Statistics for jcbc
Your Overall Score: 255
Total Movies Viewed: 687
Your Rank: 1326 out of 10001
Specificity: 99%
Sensitivity: 99%
Virtual Microscope wrote:Calibration Movies Answered Correctly 257
Calibration Movies Answered Incorrectly 2
Your Overall Score: 255
Total Real Movies Viewed: 428
Your Rank: 1326 out of 10001
Specificity: 99%
Sensitivity: 99%
I'm in the same boat. No decimal places, and similar scores to yours.jcbc wrote:I don't see any decimal places... Maybe I haven't done enough to earn them.
Maybe we're not making enough errors.VM wrote:Calibration Movies Answered Correctly 301
Calibration Movies Answered Incorrectly 2
Your Overall Score: 299
Total Real Movies Viewed: 739
Your Rank: 1171 out of 10018
Specificity: 99%
Sensitivity: 99%
Steve
---------------------------------------
Sometimes I wonder why I spend
The lonely nights
Dreaming of a song.
---------------------------------------
Sometimes I wonder why I spend
The lonely nights
Dreaming of a song.
The percentage I'm getting doesn't seem to be correct:
Calibration Movies Answered Correctly 511
Calibration Movies Answered Incorrectly 1
Your Overall Score: 510
Total Real Movies Viewed: 1386
Your Rank: 581 out of 10018
Specificity: 100.00%
Sensitivity: 99.64%
510/511 = 99.80%, not 99.64%. 99.64%=509 movies answered correctly, but I have 510 answered correctly.
Now, I may be nitpicking, but incorrect is incorrect.
ID is DJ257.
Calibration Movies Answered Correctly 511
Calibration Movies Answered Incorrectly 1
Your Overall Score: 510
Total Real Movies Viewed: 1386
Your Rank: 581 out of 10018
Specificity: 100.00%
Sensitivity: 99.64%
510/511 = 99.80%, not 99.64%. 99.64%=509 movies answered correctly, but I have 510 answered correctly.
Now, I may be nitpicking, but incorrect is incorrect.
ID is DJ257.
-
- Posts: 20
- Joined: Mon Aug 07, 2006 1:02 pm
strange...
I wonder if it does have to do with the number views.
It could be though that I have had to re-boot my PC a few times as I'm on a wireless lan and the drivers for this POS linksys card freeze up often.
Maybe I got the newest html code and you are still caching then old?
It could be though that I have had to re-boot my PC a few times as I'm on a wireless lan and the drivers for this POS linksys card freeze up often.
Maybe I got the newest html code and you are still caching then old?
-
- Posts: 20
- Joined: Mon Aug 07, 2006 1:02 pm
ESP
They must have installed that latest ESP class script that just knew we would screw up at least one more movie and was posting our future results
The calibration movies are split into "no track found" (specificity) and "track found" (sensitivity). Since you've only missed one, and it's showing up in sensitivity, then this means that for "track found" calibration movies, you have had something like 278 sensitivity calibration movies and missed one (277/278 = 99.64%) and you have gotten the 233 remaining specificity calibration movies right (233/233 = 100%).DaveJ wrote:510/511 = 99.80%, not 99.64%. 99.64%=509 movies answered correctly, but I have 510 answered correctly.
JCBC
Re: strange...
Hmm... that's very possible. I'll turn off my computer tonight.PocketLint wrote:Maybe I got the newest html code and you are still caching then old?
JCBC
I think that they calculate specificity based the number of times we say we've found a track in "blank" calibration movies. Sensitivity would be based the number of times we've missed tracks in calibration movies that have tracks. I may have that backwards.DaveJ wrote:
Specificity: 100.00%
Sensitivity: 99.64%
510/511 = 99.80%, not 99.64%. 99.64%=509 movies answered correctly, but I have 510 answered correctly.
Now, I may be nitpicking, but incorrect is incorrect.
So, you've probably looked at about 275 calibration movies with tracks, and you missed 1 of them.
274/275 = 99.64%
The other 236 (or so) calibration moves were blanks (no tracks) and you got them all correct.
I think that's how it works.
Now, can anyone tell me why I don't have any decimal places in my percentages?
Steve
---------------------------------------
Sometimes I wonder why I spend
The lonely nights
Dreaming of a song.
---------------------------------------
Sometimes I wonder why I spend
The lonely nights
Dreaming of a song.
Re: strange...
I was dusting at work today (during breaks only, of course) and I had no decimal places.jcbc wrote:Hmm... that's very possible. I'll turn off my computer tonight.PocketLint wrote:Maybe I got the newest html code and you are still caching then old?
I just booted up my computer at home, and still no decimal places.
I'm missing the point.
Steve
---------------------------------------
Sometimes I wonder why I spend
The lonely nights
Dreaming of a song.
---------------------------------------
Sometimes I wonder why I spend
The lonely nights
Dreaming of a song.
Ahhh, that makes sense! Thanks to both you and stevems.jcbc wrote:The calibration movies are split into "no track found" (specificity) and "track found" (sensitivity). Since you've only missed one, and it's showing up in sensitivity, then this means that for "track found" calibration movies, you have had something like 278 sensitivity calibration movies and missed one (277/278 = 99.64%) and you have gotten the 233 remaining specificity calibration movies right (233/233 = 100%).DaveJ wrote:510/511 = 99.80%, not 99.64%. 99.64%=509 movies answered correctly, but I have 510 answered correctly.
JCBC
What about bad focus movies???
No one mentioned bad focus???
Where does bad focus come into play, other than a viewed movie in total movies watched...it is not added to real movies or calibration, so???
Where does bad focus come into play, other than a viewed movie in total movies watched...it is not added to real movies or calibration, so???
Re: What about bad focus movies???
I don't think the bad focus movies are considered anywhere. Your total movies watched figure should be:Howie wrote:No one mentioned bad focus???
Where does bad focus come into play, other than a viewed movie in total movies watched...it is not added to real movies or calibration, so???
I estimate that for about evey 4 real movies I see, then I will judge 1 to be bad focus (as the focus range is insufficient to conclusively deduce that a track exists) and it would be nice to have these viewings be represented within the statistics on the site.Total Movies = Real Movies + Calibration (Correct) + Calibration (Incorrect)
Ziggy Stardust...
...searching for the Spiders from Mars.
...searching for the Spiders from Mars.