seven people thought so... don't know why though
Moderators: Stardust@home Team, DustMods
-
- Posts: 21
- Joined: Sat Jun 03, 2006 9:19 am
- Location: USA, Peoria Arizona
The dot in the upper left corner is not a track and I can't find anything else that looks like a track. IMHO the surface is just tilted.Betelgeuze wrote:Yeah the stats dont make a lot of sence, some things that are nothing get a lot of marks, and this one for example only got only 9 marks after 53 viewings while I clearly see a track:
http://stardustathome.ssl.berkeley.edu/ ... e_id=47394
I have to agree with Pingpang -- I'd mark it as bad focus also. If there was only that single speck, I would have clicked on it. The fact that there are two of them, however, plus that bit of aerogel that doesn't quite come into focus...Pingpang wrote:I'd probably mark it as bad focus.
IMHO "bad focus" is indeed the correct answer.
Just my tuppence
-Shar
-
- Posts: 6
- Joined: Wed Jul 12, 2006 7:38 pm
I think it would be useful to see what the tracks really look like as they get them verified. I got alot of useful information in some other sections of the forum on what the crater looking spots might be and things like that. It is hard to go by calibration movies only as they may not be the same thing. The ones I have noted are alot smaller for the most part.
Perhaps and explaination of some of the slides that look like tracks but are not. It will probably happen in time as they go through them all.
Perhaps and explaination of some of the slides that look like tracks but are not. It will probably happen in time as they go through them all.
Yeah, I was shocked to see that movie 29710 was only clicked by 9 out of 23 (including myself) at the time I came across it, now up to 12/33. Only about 1/3 see something notworthy there???
Let it never be said that your **** retentive attention to detail never yielded positive results. - Loki, Dogma
I would click that one as "Bad Focus". The bottom of the image never comes into focus.KarMann wrote:Yeah, I was shocked to see that movie 29710 was only clicked by 9 out of 23 (including myself) at the time I came across it, now up to 12/33. Only about 1/3 see something notworthy there???
JCBC
-
- Posts: 9
- Joined: Fri Aug 04, 2006 1:05 am
-
- Posts: 153
- Joined: Wed Aug 02, 2006 8:17 pm
Re: seven people thought so... don't know why though
I apologize my English and that I'm not up to the terminology yet, but do you mean "clicked Bad Focus" when telling you "flagged"...Orion_0169 wrote: So, I flagged this one, ...
Reading through this topic I would assume that you do, but just to be sure.
Viewed the movie and I would click on "Bad Focus" - one cannot really see below the surface.
-
- Posts: 153
- Joined: Wed Aug 02, 2006 8:17 pm
Petterip,
Your English appears sufficient! Yes, by flagged "put up a red flag" bringing attention to...
Clicked.
And yes, Bad Focus because of where the surface is. That's my whole point. Given so many people did NOT do that wit this movie.
Your English appears sufficient! Yes, by flagged "put up a red flag" bringing attention to...
Clicked.
And yes, Bad Focus because of where the surface is. That's my whole point. Given so many people did NOT do that wit this movie.
Je ne peux pas regarder la Mer sans me demander qui vit au-delà de cela.