Search found 20 matches
- Mon Aug 07, 2006 3:23 pm
- Forum: Message Board Archive
- Topic: "I think I've found a track, what do you think?" A
- Replies: 391
- Views: 544701
nope
if more than one come into focus, at any below surface ranges, then I would have to say no.
- Mon Aug 07, 2006 3:18 pm
- Forum: Message Board Archive
- Topic: focus
- Replies: 1
- Views: 3456
Bad focus?
I would say YES, tht is bad focus.
Any valid tracks will be below surface. If the movie has no below surface frames that how could you tell if there was any tracks?
All tracks will be below surface..
Any valid tracks will be below surface. If the movie has no below surface frames that how could you tell if there was any tracks?
All tracks will be below surface..
- Mon Aug 07, 2006 1:53 pm
- Forum: Message Board Archive
- Topic: None more black object
- Replies: 8
- Views: 11039
Oh no
More like the accusing finger of my mother-in-law's gloved hand.
Darth-Mom I call her.
Darth-Mom I call her.
- Mon Aug 07, 2006 1:49 pm
- Forum: Message Board Archive
- Topic: "I think I've found a track, what do you think?" A
- Replies: 391
- Views: 544701
No track
Even though it comes into focus below surface, it does not stay in focus. so I have to say this is not a track. A true track should have a few frames at least where it stays in focus below surface. This seems to be an artifact where it is already existed in the gel. Remember, the idea here is that a...
- Mon Aug 07, 2006 1:19 pm
- Forum: Message Board Archive
- Topic: Calibration woes
- Replies: 2
- Views: 5202
Calibration woes
There is one or more calibration movies where the below surface focus only has like two or three frames. For me that is not enough foucs range to be useful so I click on bad focus and I end up getting a hit for it. Most calibration frames where there is a track, it;s in the last few focus slides. so...