Search found 20 matches

by PocketLint
Mon Aug 07, 2006 3:23 pm
Forum: Message Board Archive
Topic: "I think I've found a track, what do you think?" A
Replies: 391
Views: 544701

nope

if more than one come into focus, at any below surface ranges, then I would have to say no.
by PocketLint
Mon Aug 07, 2006 3:18 pm
Forum: Message Board Archive
Topic: focus
Replies: 1
Views: 3456

Bad focus?

I would say YES, tht is bad focus.

Any valid tracks will be below surface. If the movie has no below surface frames that how could you tell if there was any tracks?

All tracks will be below surface..
by PocketLint
Mon Aug 07, 2006 1:53 pm
Forum: Message Board Archive
Topic: None more black object
Replies: 8
Views: 11039

Oh no

More like the accusing finger of my mother-in-law's gloved hand.
Darth-Mom I call her.
by PocketLint
Mon Aug 07, 2006 1:49 pm
Forum: Message Board Archive
Topic: "I think I've found a track, what do you think?" A
Replies: 391
Views: 544701

No track

Even though it comes into focus below surface, it does not stay in focus. so I have to say this is not a track. A true track should have a few frames at least where it stays in focus below surface. This seems to be an artifact where it is already existed in the gel. Remember, the idea here is that a...
by PocketLint
Mon Aug 07, 2006 1:19 pm
Forum: Message Board Archive
Topic: Calibration woes
Replies: 2
Views: 5202

Calibration woes

There is one or more calibration movies where the below surface focus only has like two or three frames. For me that is not enough foucs range to be useful so I click on bad focus and I end up getting a hit for it. Most calibration frames where there is a track, it;s in the last few focus slides. so...