Search found 680 matches
- Fri Apr 24, 2009 5:20 pm
- Forum: Stardust@home Problems and Support
- Topic: "There's a problem with this focus movie"
- Replies: 564
- Views: 1355999
Re: Bad + CM
Movie 9709624V1 seems to be a bad positive CM. (location of track 156, 333) Coordinates of track must be wrong. Sorry for the late reply, but can you clarify what you mean. Did you click at 156,333 and get it wrong? If so, then you were close enough and shouldn't have received a score for an incorr...
- Wed Apr 15, 2009 4:19 pm
- Forum: Stardust@home Discussion
- Topic: Weekly trends
- Replies: 29
- Views: 62718
Re: Weekly trends
Not clear to me, though, is whether we've evaluated the top-left 1/3 of the collector tiles during phases I & II to a sufficient, or perhaps even more than sufficient, extent; apparently there are now over 100 candidate tracks awaiting extraction. Would it matter, for example, if all dusters we...
- Wed Apr 15, 2009 9:53 am
- Forum: Stardust@home Problems and Support
- Topic: Database Errors -> Lower Sensitivity
- Replies: 1
- Views: 4806
Re: Database Errors
Checked with the techs on this and it seems to have been a temporary glitch. All should be working okay now.
- Mon Mar 09, 2009 11:20 am
- Forum: Stardust@home Problems and Support
- Topic: Sensitivity and specificity
- Replies: 3
- Views: 7106
Re: Appreciation
From what I've heard, the search will probably last at least another year and the science stemming from the search could continue for years to come.Zoerel wrote:When will we be done ???
- Fri Mar 06, 2009 5:26 pm
- Forum: Stardust@home Problems and Support
- Topic: Sensitivity and specificity
- Replies: 3
- Views: 7106
Re: Sensitivity and specificity
Hi Zoerel, I'm a little new here, but in the future I hope to help out a little with fielding questions and the like in these forums. However, in this "early stage," all I can recommend at this time is to check out two previous discussions at http://stardustathome.ssl.berkeley.edu/forum/vi...