Stardust@home

My theory is that it's so deep the entry mark will be on a different movie. Possible the top one. That's why I wanted to know how the numbering system worked so maybe I could load it and look for it there.

That will not work.. You would need to know how many movies you clicked first and right now that information is not available...

If 50 people voted for the same movie it's still only one movie..

I have a question, What is the system to naming the movies.. I want to be able to figure out what movie is on the right, left, top and bottom of this one: http://stardustathome.ssl.berkeley.edu/myevents_viewer.php?id=3026338V1 Of 38 people that so far has viewed it I seem to be the only one so far t...

Works perfect in Firefox. Full screen F11, It's the only browser i use.

I think that you will find and will be one of the discoveries of StarDust is that the density is much higher than previously estimated. I predict that hundreds of tracks will be found...

Dark Matter anyone?

I agree drop the calibration movies. It's a complete waste, Can you imagine somebody has actually viewed over 9000 of them already? For what? What a waste of time.. If you miss a spot too bad somebody else will surely find it.. When you find a spot you should be able to outline it with a red marking...

We simply don't know if the tracks would go all the way through or not because we have almost no "real" data to base that on. In fact, The movies supplied in the training and calibration movies could look completely different from the real deal. I see absolutely no reason for this situati...

Not confirmed mind you. Chances are it's not one but it's interesting anyway

http://tinyurl.com/kgpjj

I didn't realize there was a thread for this exact topic. I posted this on a related FAQ thread reposted below: Ok I'm at home plugging away got 100 % and 97.5% fine go to work log on Hmm demoted to 95.64 % on both.. Problem is I never did any between those times.. None. The math don't even make sen...