Search found 153 matches

by Orion_0169
Mon Aug 07, 2006 7:48 pm
Forum: Stardust@home Discussion
Topic: Stardust@home Suggestion Thread
Replies: 276
Views: 306189

Tim, there's a difference between "I can't do it" and "it can't be done" If, as you say, it is physically impossible for someone to run up some scores without a team of people, then I, without a team of people can apparently do the impossible. Now, given that I shouldn't be ABLE to do the impossibl...
by Orion_0169
Mon Aug 07, 2006 5:26 pm
Forum: Message Board Archive
Topic: seven people thought so... don't know why though
Replies: 46
Views: 37516

Stardust, I had just done it before that post. And it already had the pile of flags on it. That was my whole point. A pile of people before me, had flagged a movie that clearly was bad focus as it was only the last couple of layers that it came in. My issue was that if people were simply marking do...
by Orion_0169
Mon Aug 07, 2006 4:41 pm
Forum: Message Board Archive
Topic: 'My List of Data Viewed' question
Replies: 6
Views: 7077

:shock:
by Orion_0169
Mon Aug 07, 2006 4:40 pm
Forum: Stardust@home Discussion
Topic: Who gets "new" movies?
Replies: 21
Views: 19431

Diamond, one and the same. If it is random, then the more you do the more likely to see one before someone else.
by Orion_0169
Mon Aug 07, 2006 1:28 pm
Forum: Message Board Archive
Topic: "I think I've found a track, what do you think?" A
Replies: 391
Views: 318721

If you mean the out of focus ring that darkens to a focussed point. This is the stuff I've been talking about. The fact that it isn't in focus AS the layers go down would indicate it is something in the gel already. Not something that has entered the gel.
by Orion_0169
Mon Aug 07, 2006 1:25 pm
Forum: Message Board Archive
Topic: seven people thought so... don't know why though
Replies: 46
Views: 37516

DustBuster, My doing that once in the thousands I have seen can't have anywhere near the impact that all the people flagging incorrectly on a regular basis does. Believe me, I wrestled with doing it in the first place, then the curiosity got the better of me, and the statistics made it harmless in ...
by Orion_0169
Mon Aug 07, 2006 11:36 am
Forum: Stardust@home Problems and Support
Topic: Official Stardust@Home Issue & Status List UPDATED 10:57
Replies: 131
Views: 240320

css Just don't let it become a habit. First off there are callibration movies with VERY small tracks that are easy to miss. Also some of the features that allow you to quickly identify callibration movies sometimes show up in regular movies.
by Orion_0169
Mon Aug 07, 2006 11:23 am
Forum: Message Board Archive
Topic: New focus movies
Replies: 2
Views: 3886

Mentioned a few times that I hope they are done in batches. When one batch is done to death, remove it and replace it with a whole new batch. (I also suggested this would be a good time to reset scores to be more encouraging for people that feel they are too far behind to matter... yeah yeah I know...
by Orion_0169
Mon Aug 07, 2006 11:09 am
Forum: Stardust@home Problems and Support
Topic: Official Stardust@Home Issue & Status List UPDATED 10:57
Replies: 131
Views: 240320

Talked about that elsewhere a bunch. Having you checked against yourself doesn't make it a bug. It pads the stats though.
by Orion_0169
Mon Aug 07, 2006 10:57 am
Forum: Stardust@home Problems and Support
Topic: Official Stardust@Home Issue & Status List UPDATED 10:57
Replies: 131
Views: 240320

Stardust, I'm in the same boat. Callibration counts are so high that the percentages can barely budge. Also same with errors, I've only had two or three in the last 1000+ callibration movies and those are all the buggy ones. Mind you, it APPEARS that some of those buggy ones might not be around any...
by Orion_0169
Mon Aug 07, 2006 10:55 am
Forum: Message Board Archive
Topic: Appears to be new rating problem/bug
Replies: 6
Views: 5829

Because I have been through so many callibration movies, it takes an eternity to see any change in my percentages. One mistake here and there does pretty much nothing. This is why I suggested, a while ago, that the %'s be shown to two or three decimal places.
by Orion_0169
Mon Aug 07, 2006 10:48 am
Forum: Stardust@home Discussion
Topic: Stardust@home Suggestion Thread
Replies: 276
Views: 306189

Cyphers,

Size of the blue bars tells you if it's loaded. Sometimes... alright a little more often than sometimes, it gets 'almost done' like what you've described. Some people have suggested the images load bottom to top since that's where the action is ;-)
by Orion_0169
Mon Aug 07, 2006 9:56 am
Forum: Message Board Archive
Topic: seven people thought so... don't know why though
Replies: 46
Views: 37516

Petterip,

Your English appears sufficient! :) Yes, by flagged "put up a red flag" bringing attention to...

Clicked.

;-)

And yes, Bad Focus because of where the surface is. That's my whole point. Given so many people did NOT do that wit this movie.
by Orion_0169
Mon Aug 07, 2006 9:54 am
Forum: Message Board Archive
Topic: seven people thought so... don't know why though
Replies: 46
Views: 37516

Oddly enough, the agreement rate of THIS movie is higher... and it's a bad focus.
by Orion_0169
Mon Aug 07, 2006 8:32 am
Forum: Stardust@home Discussion
Topic: Stardust@home Suggestion Thread
Replies: 276
Views: 306189

Yes icebike, had that a couple of times ;-)

Also a button for "Interesting Artifact" (lower priority in the context of this project, but perhaps worth looking at.

And a button for completely empty movies. Get them out of the samples.