Search found 37 matches
- Wed Aug 09, 2006 7:37 am
- Forum: Stardust@home Discussion
- Topic: Why there are only 45 interstellar dust particles?
- Replies: 9
- Views: 12884
- Wed Aug 09, 2006 6:55 am
- Forum: Stardust@home Community
- Topic: Post your stats
- Replies: 193
- Views: 430145
- Fri Aug 04, 2006 12:38 pm
- Forum: Stardust@home Discussion
- Topic: stat padders already?
- Replies: 34
- Views: 42496
- Fri Aug 04, 2006 12:13 pm
- Forum: Stardust@home Discussion
- Topic: stat padders already?
- Replies: 34
- Views: 42496
I do not think you are reading my posts. I am not saying that what you are doing seems impossible...I think most people could do it. The tough part is doing it with highest accuracy. Most people don't do it that fast because accuracy fails. Again, missing easy calibration videos shows that one is no...
- Fri Aug 04, 2006 11:58 am
- Forum: Stardust@home Discussion
- Topic: stat padders already?
- Replies: 34
- Views: 42496
No one has called Robert Evans a cheater. I havn't anyway. I havn't called you a cheater either. I do not think you can even cheat at stardust@home. The goal of stardust isn't a score, its number of dust particals found. How can you cheat at that? I would like to see Robert Evans memorize the surfac...
- Fri Aug 04, 2006 11:53 am
- Forum: Stardust@home Discussion
- Topic: stat padders already?
- Replies: 34
- Views: 42496
- Fri Aug 04, 2006 11:46 am
- Forum: Stardust@home Discussion
- Topic: stat padders already?
- Replies: 34
- Views: 42496
- Fri Aug 04, 2006 11:33 am
- Forum: Stardust@home Discussion
- Topic: stat padders already?
- Replies: 34
- Views: 42496
Sorry, I saw that +3 next to 36 and thought you meant 39...heh However, who says 97% is good? That's 3 out of 100 wrong. Sure that's good in school, but when we are looking for a needle in a haystack of haystacks, 97% seems pretty inaccurate. With a 1 in 40,000 chance of finding a track, missing 1,2...
- Fri Aug 04, 2006 10:55 am
- Forum: Stardust@home Discussion
- Topic: stat padders already?
- Replies: 34
- Views: 42496
I do not mean to rag, but how have you missed 39 calibration movies? The calibration movie tracks are supposed to be the easiest tracks to spot. If you've missed 39 of the easiest to spot, imagine how many possible real tracks you might miss. It might not bother you to miss tracks and it's really no...
- Thu Aug 03, 2006 2:57 pm
- Forum: Message Board Archive
- Topic: "I think I've found a track, what do you think?" A
- Replies: 391
- Views: 544916
- Thu Aug 03, 2006 2:52 pm
- Forum: Stardust@home Community
- Topic: Whats YOUR screen resolution?
- Replies: 28
- Views: 44539
- Thu Aug 03, 2006 2:50 pm
- Forum: Stardust@home Discussion
- Topic: Do you think stardust even keeps track of first track finder
- Replies: 5
- Views: 10269
- Thu Aug 03, 2006 2:48 pm
- Forum: Message Board Archive
- Topic: "I think I've found a track, what do you think?" A
- Replies: 391
- Views: 544916
Promising movies? Most "Number of Agreements"
I currently have a movie with 5 agreements(15 views) and one with 4 agreements(15 views). Promising?
Anyone else have a "agreeable" movies?
Anyone else have a "agreeable" movies?
- Thu Aug 03, 2006 2:41 pm
- Forum: Stardust@home Discussion
- Topic: Do you think stardust even keeps track of first track finder
- Replies: 5
- Views: 10269
- Thu Aug 03, 2006 2:28 pm
- Forum: Stardust@home Discussion
- Topic: How the top scorers get those scores.
- Replies: 75
- Views: 120035
I agree. The more movies I do, the slower and more meticulous I seem to get. Now I spend at least 20 seconds on a movie that is not a test and has good focus. I've viewed over 550 movies and have gotten all of my 135 calibration movies correct. I believe this is important because if I miss a few of ...