Stardust@home

Hi fjgiie, Thanks for responding to what may turn-out to have been a skewered question. One of the movie titles I've cited was misread from a running tally. Seems I've made something of a small mistake by incorrectly referencing one movie I did not mean to. The first movie cited, #8234098V1 was, how...

As a new public member to the group, I am still trying to get a handle on what I am looking for when it comes to designating a particle track as being a prime candidate for Stardust sainthood. For example, the following two listed movies, #8234098v1 and #2736932v1 appear, for all intents and purpose...

I may be wrong but there appears to be more than one track on some movies. Sometimes even as many as three or four different and distinct tracks on a single movie. Thanks.

Hi DanZ thanks for the reply and the welcome. It makes perfect sense, I suppose, that the particles may and can have a snowplow effect when when encountering the aerogel. Surprising it doesn't happen more frequently. Must admit, however, that seeing the track you've referenced, the I1043,1,30 Track ...

As a new member to the Stardust public team effort, I have a small question: I notice that in the "Stardust Search Tutorial: Views 2 and 3" appear to contain double stardust particles but only, possibly, single tracks (although one of them seems to provide a double track). Anyone else noti...