7465314V1
What do you think?
Search found 11 matches
- Sun Nov 25, 2007 9:08 am
- Forum: Stardust@home Discussion
- Topic: "I found a cute, funny, interesting, etc. movie"
- Replies: 738
- Views: 1113794
- Fri Nov 23, 2007 9:50 am
- Forum: FAQs
- Topic: I answered a calibration movie right but was scored wrong
- Replies: 257
- Views: 560534
The simulated track of cm 7765301V1 at (391,336) appears to start well above the surface.
- Tue Nov 20, 2007 11:48 am
- Forum: FAQs
- Topic: I answered a calibration movie right but was scored wrong
- Replies: 257
- Views: 560534
2297302V1 I clicked at coords (471,181) out of three candidates spotted (others at (449,115) and (50,240).) Again it said I missed one!! Don't tell me this was another inclusion.... I wish I had saved the ID, but another cm had the exact same foxus-signature of the track I clicked on here and there...
- Tue Nov 20, 2007 11:33 am
- Forum: FAQs
- Topic: I answered a calibration movie right but was scored wrong
- Replies: 257
- Views: 560534
5601418V1
A c.m. with track at coord (130,219), minutes before this post. I did click that location, yet I was penalized for missing it
A c.m. with track at coord (130,219), minutes before this post. I did click that location, yet I was penalized for missing it
- Sun Nov 18, 2007 1:05 pm
- Forum: FAQs
- Topic: I answered a calibration movie right but was scored wrong
- Replies: 257
- Views: 560534
I can understand that I just hope they're not doing more harm than good.jsmaje wrote:According to Bryan, "afterall, the CMs are generated by an automated program". Well, what can you expect ....
- Sun Nov 18, 2007 11:46 am
- Forum: FAQs
- Topic: I answered a calibration movie right but was scored wrong
- Replies: 257
- Views: 560534
- Sun Nov 18, 2007 11:26 am
- Forum: FAQs
- Topic: I answered a calibration movie right but was scored wrong
- Replies: 257
- Views: 560534
Another poorly pasted fake-cm I think: 6230336V1
Coords: (201,41)
At this rate I fear I may be developing more of an eye for fake cm's than for real tracks... Why can't they just stick to confirmed real ones to use for calibration-movies?
Coords: (201,41)
At this rate I fear I may be developing more of an eye for fake cm's than for real tracks... Why can't they just stick to confirmed real ones to use for calibration-movies?
- Sun Nov 18, 2007 2:38 am
- Forum: FAQs
- Topic: I answered a calibration movie right but was scored wrong
- Replies: 257
- Views: 560534
6756447V1 Another one missed :( I guess the track I thought I spotted at coords(165,242) is another inclusion then? The intended cm-track in retrospect is at (362,43). Immediately focussing on the one I thought I saw, I completely missed that one. Btw, jsmaje, your demo doesn't appear to work in my...
- Sat Nov 17, 2007 1:34 pm
- Forum: FAQs
- Topic: I answered a calibration movie right but was scored wrong
- Replies: 257
- Views: 560534
The second one (which you clicked on) is a typical inclusion, showing no sign at the surface, then only focussing over just two or three bars at a clearly subsurface level. If there had been any more depth to the movie I suspect it would have defocussed just as quickly. Can I suggest you have a loo...
- Sat Nov 17, 2007 7:07 am
- Forum: FAQs
- Topic: I answered a calibration movie right but was scored wrong
- Replies: 257
- Views: 560534
Please consider this cm: 543202V1 . Apparently it must contain a track, for I was penalized for judging it a no-track movie :oops:. However, even in retrospect I still cannot seem to locate it. I do realize there's a very distinguishing feature almost near the center (285,221) of the movie, but beca...
- Sat Nov 17, 2007 4:10 am
- Forum: FAQs
- Topic: I answered a calibration movie right but was scored wrong
- Replies: 257
- Views: 560534
Movie ID# : 338523V1 To my eyes there are in fact two candidate tracks present, one very near the surface at coords (247,124) and one that just starts to appear at the very end of the focus range at coords (315,45). I clicked the latter and was penalized for missing a track :shock: no fair :cry: Thi...