Search found 4 matches

by studebaker
Wed Aug 09, 2006 12:24 pm
Forum: Stardust@home Discussion
Topic: Multiple viewings of FOVs: statistical analysis, conclusions
Replies: 8
Views: 9411

And I should point out that with an anticipated 2.2 to 3.0 real tracks in this data subset, it is entirely possible that we have zero real tracks in here, since sqrt(2.2) = 1.5 and sqrt(3.0) = 1.73. So zero real tracks would be less than two standard deviations, although that's only approximately co...
by studebaker
Wed Aug 09, 2006 11:28 am
Forum: Stardust@home Discussion
Topic: Multiple viewings of FOVs: statistical analysis, conclusions
Replies: 8
Views: 9411

Multiple viewings of FOVs: statistical analysis, conclusions

The fact that some of the movies identified in each of our "My Events" stats have been viewed many times (as noted here in the forum in another topic) invites some analysis. Some observations: In my "My events" section of statistics, I've flagged five funny-looking movies. They've been viewed an ave...
by studebaker
Mon Aug 07, 2006 4:28 pm
Forum: Message Board Archive
Topic: Has looked 800 real movies, but has not found any track
Replies: 10
Views: 10105

They estimate 45 or so tracks in the entire collector array, out of roughly a million focus movies. It's not at all odd that you haven't found anything after looking at 900 movies. You should probably have seen some wacky inclusion thing that you might have flagged. Some other poster here had a movi...
by studebaker
Mon Aug 07, 2006 4:25 pm
Forum: Message Board Archive
Topic: "I think I've found a track, what do you think?" A
Replies: 391
Views: 319397

The focus is bad. And it looks like inclusions.