Search found 15 matches
- Sat Aug 12, 2006 6:16 am
- Forum: Stardust@home Discussion
- Topic: Particle size
- Replies: 18
- Views: 26933
Re: Sideways track example....
I have reported a sideways track example and it is currently at the "in 1st review" stage of StarDust@Home's official comments. http://stardustathome.ssl.berkeley.edu/myevents_viewer.php?id=8153179V1 Now there's a clear track! Thanks for the link. I hope when the training material is upda...
- Sat Aug 12, 2006 5:50 am
- Forum: Stardust@home Discussion
- Topic: Are we really looking carefully enough?
- Replies: 39
- Views: 38869
If memory serves me right, the gel was exposed to the dust trail for several days, before returning to Earth. According to the article Interstellar Dust: The Hunt for the Building Blocks of the Universe by Amir Alexander in The Planetary Report [/url] vol. 26 number 4, the gel was exposed up to sev...
- Tue Aug 08, 2006 12:42 pm
- Forum: Stardust@home Discussion
- Topic: Need more technically advanced FAQ/tutorial/feedback
- Replies: 16
- Views: 20118
...and if a further link is needed, there's a page of "science-in-depth" at the beforementioned JPL website. I think I'll read it through, too
Thanks, Wolter 


- Tue Aug 08, 2006 12:33 pm
- Forum: Stardust@home Discussion
- Topic: Track agreements?
- Replies: 4
- Views: 7073
Re: Track agreements?
Briefly (in my opinion); it could be someplace else.Oberon wrote: Does the agreement mean that they saw a track at the same spot that I did or could it be some place else in the same movie?
- Tue Aug 08, 2006 12:29 pm
- Forum: Stardust@home Discussion
- Topic: Slightly discouraged?
- Replies: 18
- Views: 20988
Re: Slightly discouraged?
The problem is, they only have something like 60000 movies in the VM. Actually, to be specific, a software-generated random number is not necessarily that random. It depends a lot on the algorithm used. Add that to the fact that when - say, a couple of hundred - simultaenous users are going through...
- Tue Aug 08, 2006 12:13 pm
- Forum: Message Board Archive
- Topic: Forum is becoming usless!
- Replies: 6
- Views: 8450
- Mon Aug 07, 2006 9:44 pm
- Forum: Stardust@home Discussion
- Topic: Stardust at home not very fun any more
- Replies: 19
- Views: 25245
- Mon Aug 07, 2006 9:38 pm
- Forum: Stardust@home Discussion
- Topic: Stardust at home not very fun any more
- Replies: 19
- Views: 25245
Re: Stardust at home not very fun any more
This isn't a game and the scores seem to be for the elite that have hundreds of hours per week and nothing else to do. You're right, this isn't a game. And I've got only an hour or two per day maximum since I got a lot more things to do in my life. Which is good - my eyes would get sore from watchi...
- Mon Aug 07, 2006 9:26 pm
- Forum: Message Board Archive
- Topic: focus often way too low
- Replies: 2
- Views: 5479
Re: focus often way too low
I would appreciate any pointers as to how shallow a focus ought to be permitted without hitting "bad focus. For some guidance, please check this out. In general, if you feel you can't really make a judgement of whether there might be a track or not because of a focus problem, hit "bad foc...
- Mon Aug 07, 2006 9:12 pm
- Forum: Stardust@home Discussion
- Topic: "I found a cute, funny, interesting, etc. movie"
- Replies: 738
- Views: 688812
- Mon Aug 07, 2006 11:25 am
- Forum: Stardust@home Community
- Topic: SAY "HI" TO THE COMMUNITY
- Replies: 144
- Views: 234962
Yo. Been a science and astronomy hobbyist since I was able to connect a two pieces of Lego blocks together, here I find myself at my starting 30's, looking off- and on-focused images of stuff that resembles a lot of the jelly stuff that you can nowadays find in domestic gel-candles... :shock: I've p...
- Mon Aug 07, 2006 10:06 am
- Forum: Message Board Archive
- Topic: seven people thought so... don't know why though
- Replies: 46
- Views: 43463
- Mon Aug 07, 2006 10:04 am
- Forum: Message Board Archive
- Topic: Reverse focus
- Replies: 0
- Views: 4958
Reverse focus
I noticed today that in some movies the focus is reversed :shock: so that "Focus Up" seemed to actually be "Focus Down" and vice versa. There was still scope to see deep enough, though, so I didn't mark them 'Bad Focus'. Any encounters, others? :oops: I didn't get the movie numbe...
- Mon Aug 07, 2006 9:54 am
- Forum: Message Board Archive
- Topic: seven people thought so... don't know why though
- Replies: 46
- Views: 43463
Re: seven people thought so... don't know why though
So, I flagged this one, ... I apologize my English and that I'm not up to the terminology yet, but do you mean "clicked Bad Focus" when telling you "flagged"... :?: Reading through this topic I would assume that you do, but just to be sure. Viewed the movie and I would click on ...
- Mon Aug 07, 2006 9:40 am
- Forum: Stardust@home Problems and Support
- Topic: Problem with focus, images load slowly
- Replies: 7
- Views: 11351