Search found 3 matches

by gr8tfly
Thu Aug 10, 2006 11:49 am
Forum: Stardust@home Problems and Support
Topic: Official Stardust@Home Issue & Status List UPDATED 10:57
Replies: 131
Views: 245940

another: specificity=sensitivity

Had 100% specificity, 98% sensitivity (5 out of 406 missed) on 8/9. Sometime after that (last night), it changed to 97.74%/97.74%, with same number missed (so, the missed were still "sensitivity" type).

Just another data point for trouble shooting.

Thanks again to the team.
by gr8tfly
Wed Aug 02, 2006 3:48 pm
Forum: Stardust@home Discussion
Topic: Stardust@home Suggestion Thread
Replies: 276
Views: 316802

VM Interface Suggestion

Just a thought: I would find it very informative to have some feedback on the relative depth while focusing (Z-axis, like 0µm to 140µm). Even just a static vertical scale alongside the focus control would be nice. But, a label for the active focus "slice" would be better. As I'm writing this, it occ...
by gr8tfly
Wed Aug 02, 2006 3:34 pm
Forum: Message Board Archive
Topic: "Bad" Focus Range Definition
Replies: 1
Views: 3208

"Bad" Focus Range Definition

I have found a few focus movies where the surface focus appears to be in the bottom 1/4 to 1/3 of the total range. Since the examples and calibration movies place a track in that range, it seems reasonable to assume an actual track will be in that range. It's necessary to have "above surface" imagin...