"I think I've found a track, what do you think?"

Discuss your experiences with and ideas about Stardust@home here.

Moderators: Stardust@home Team, DustMods

fjgiie
DustMod
Posts: 1253
Joined: Sat May 20, 2006 8:47 am
Location: Hampton, SC, US

My two dollars worth

Post by fjgiie »

cthiker wrote:...due to the angle of reflection from the camera lighting, bright instead of dark
Do you notice how everything has that white reflective look? Looks like the lighting is being reflected directly into the microscope...
like you said. I marked the ones like this that I saw as no track, too much going on.

fjgiie
Dust Probe
Posts: 2
Joined: Thu Sep 07, 2006 10:05 am
Location: Germany

Post by Dust Probe »

Mighty Pete wrote:cthiker:

I've posted pictures of these before also. It's like the focus is to deep, But I still look for the carrot shaped tracks anyway. Some I've marked bad focus which they are because you can't see the surface.

Dust Probe:

Glass shards on the surface.
thank you. That will increase my recon skill.
1593 out of 14252
buddhabuddha
Posts: 65
Joined: Wed May 31, 2006 2:58 pm

Post by buddhabuddha »

Wahoo Jesus! Looks like a perfect track to me...long and travels into and out of focus as you go down. Exciting!
Howie
Posts: 331
Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 2:47 pm
Location: Florida

Post by Howie »

Dust Probe wrote:Possible an interstellar dust particle?

first one:

http://stardustathome.ssl.berkeley.edu/ ... =4589365V1

second one:

http://stardustathome.ssl.berkeley.edu/ ... =5062922V1



---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1665 out of 14252
**********************************

1st one ??? 2nd one may be a track??? Howie
Howie
Posts: 331
Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 2:47 pm
Location: Florida

Not sure where to post it as everyone seems to be here???

Post by Howie »

Just have to ask about all the dirt/junk om the movies???

Is this before, after or during the flight???

I know this is new and a adventure, but, knowing the cleanliness of this sort of expedition, where the heck did all this garbage come from???

Would really like a section devoted on this or in updates or news???

Let me know where to look...

Sincerely,
Howie
Klemek
Posts: 54
Joined: Tue Aug 22, 2006 8:15 am
Location: Seville, Spain

possible dust track

Post by Klemek »

What do you think about that small thing almoust in the center? It becomes visible when you set focus depth all the way down.
http://stardustathome.ssl.berkeley.edu/ ... =6591597V1
minerjp
Posts: 5
Joined: Thu Sep 07, 2006 7:49 pm
Location: Sandy, Utah

Probably Bad Focus but...

Post by minerjp »

10 of 27 so far agree. After 10,000 real movies, this one grabbed my attention, but I do agree its at the bottom of the focus.

http://stardustathome.ssl.berkeley.edu/ ... =5061817V1

What say you all?

JP
minerjp
Posts: 5
Joined: Thu Sep 07, 2006 7:49 pm
Location: Sandy, Utah

Re: possible dust track

Post by minerjp »

Klemek wrote:What do you think about that small thing almoust in the center? It becomes visible when you set focus depth all the way down.
http://stardustathome.ssl.berkeley.edu/ ... =6591597V1

I've seen calibration movies that look just like that. Probably an inclusion, but sure worth clicking on.

JP
Mighty Pete
Posts: 146
Joined: Thu Aug 10, 2006 7:47 am
Contact:

Post by Mighty Pete »

Klemek:


Woops wrong movie. That would be a inclussion. Notice there is two of them. It's up to you if you click on them or not. I just think there glass flaws, Nothing there but at the right angle there appears to be, Like opal.
Last edited by Mighty Pete on Sat Sep 09, 2006 10:03 am, edited 1 time in total.
LCARS
Posts: 22
Joined: Thu Aug 03, 2006 1:08 am

Re: possible dust track

Post by LCARS »

Klemek wrote:What do you think about that small thing almoust in the center? It becomes visible when you set focus depth all the way down.
http://stardustathome.ssl.berkeley.edu/ ... =6591597V1
I say inclusions, there's more than one and they resolve into specs without anything focusing below the surface up to that point.
~My brain hurts~
Wolter
DustMod
Posts: 457
Joined: Mon May 22, 2006 2:23 am
Location: Enkhuizen, the Netherlands

Re: Probably Bad Focus but...

Post by Wolter »

minerjp wrote:10 of 27 so far agree. After 10,000 real movies, this one grabbed my attention, but I do agree its at the bottom of the focus.

http://stardustathome.ssl.berkeley.edu/ ... =5061817V1

What say you all?

JP
Well it starts getting into focus above the surface so it can't be an entry mark. It needs to be scanned again. Bad focus
Just dusting... Image
Darnok
Posts: 5
Joined: Thu Sep 07, 2006 7:07 am

Post by Darnok »

DustBuster
DustMod
Posts: 694
Joined: Wed May 17, 2006 8:12 pm
Location: Horsetown, USA

Post by DustBuster »

Darnok wrote:It's interesting:

http://stardustathome.ssl.berkeley.edu/ ... =9545029V1

Track?
Hi Darnok.

If you are referring to the small speck that appears below the surface, there is an example in the latest findings update HERE
No dessert for you- ONE MONTH!
Klemek
Posts: 54
Joined: Tue Aug 22, 2006 8:15 am
Location: Seville, Spain

possible dust track

Post by Klemek »

thanks for comments guys
DustBuster
DustMod
Posts: 694
Joined: Wed May 17, 2006 8:12 pm
Location: Horsetown, USA

Post by DustBuster »

Mighty Pete wrote:Klemek:

That would be a bad focus movie. You are not really entering the glass yet. Interesting though.
I think that response was meant for minerjp, am I right Pete? The FOV from Klemek does go below the surface, but the one referenced by minerjp only comes into focus at the very end of the bars.
No dessert for you- ONE MONTH!
Post Reply