greuti wrote:Have two of such potential candidates (ok, probably only one of them) with too low agreements:
http://stardustathome.ssl.berkeley.edu/ ... =9769349V1 10/212 - down-right quarter. It looks different to a common inclusion.
http://stardustathome.ssl.berkeley.edu/ ... =6054940V1 1/208 - top-right quarter. Ok, that's one of those speculative clicks, besides the bad focus decisions. :)
I guess 10 or 5 clicks of (over) 200 viewings are the same problem regarding not get reviewed for long time.
wxman04 wrote:This one has a bit more than five hits (9 agreements out of 311 views), but could be worthy of investigation, I think. It's hard to see -- at the bottom center next to the dot.
http://stardustathome.ssl.berkeley.edu/ ... =9764334V1
I have two more promising ones (5 of 31 and 3 of 15). I'll give those a bit more time.
DustBuster wrote:Do you have events with 5 or less agreements that seem to be promising candidates that are 'Indeterminate' status?
I've noticed these FOV's have also been viewed about half as many times as other events in my list.
Here are some examples:
Any others that seem they are being overlooked because of their low rating or limited distribution?
skeeter wrote:Here are two examples from my events
http://stardustathome.ssl.berkeley.edu/ ... =3734336V1
45 viewers & 2 agreements
http://stardustathome.ssl.berkeley.edu/ ... =5122956V1
34 viewers & 4 agreements
I think the number of low viewers on most of these is due to people clicking bad focus.
skeeter wrote:3734336V1 is in the lower right corner - right on top of the "wrinkle"
5122956V1 is lower right quadrant, about 1/3 of the way from the bottom and about 1 inch from the right.
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 0 guests