Page 27 of 91

My two dollars worth

Posted: Thu Sep 07, 2006 10:53 am
by fjgiie
cthiker wrote:...due to the angle of reflection from the camera lighting, bright instead of dark
Do you notice how everything has that white reflective look? Looks like the lighting is being reflected directly into the microscope...
like you said. I marked the ones like this that I saw as no track, too much going on.

fjgiie

Posted: Thu Sep 07, 2006 10:55 am
by Dust Probe
Mighty Pete wrote:cthiker:

I've posted pictures of these before also. It's like the focus is to deep, But I still look for the carrot shaped tracks anyway. Some I've marked bad focus which they are because you can't see the surface.

Dust Probe:

Glass shards on the surface.
thank you. That will increase my recon skill.

Posted: Thu Sep 07, 2006 12:55 pm
by buddhabuddha
Wahoo Jesus! Looks like a perfect track to me...long and travels into and out of focus as you go down. Exciting!

Posted: Thu Sep 07, 2006 1:20 pm
by Howie
Dust Probe wrote:Possible an interstellar dust particle?

first one:

http://stardustathome.ssl.berkeley.edu/ ... =4589365V1

second one:

http://stardustathome.ssl.berkeley.edu/ ... =5062922V1



---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1665 out of 14252
**********************************

1st one ??? 2nd one may be a track??? Howie

Not sure where to post it as everyone seems to be here???

Posted: Thu Sep 07, 2006 3:48 pm
by Howie
Just have to ask about all the dirt/junk om the movies???

Is this before, after or during the flight???

I know this is new and a adventure, but, knowing the cleanliness of this sort of expedition, where the heck did all this garbage come from???

Would really like a section devoted on this or in updates or news???

Let me know where to look...

Sincerely,
Howie

possible dust track

Posted: Thu Sep 07, 2006 7:21 pm
by Klemek
What do you think about that small thing almoust in the center? It becomes visible when you set focus depth all the way down.
http://stardustathome.ssl.berkeley.edu/ ... =6591597V1

Probably Bad Focus but...

Posted: Thu Sep 07, 2006 8:15 pm
by minerjp
10 of 27 so far agree. After 10,000 real movies, this one grabbed my attention, but I do agree its at the bottom of the focus.

http://stardustathome.ssl.berkeley.edu/ ... =5061817V1

What say you all?

JP

Re: possible dust track

Posted: Thu Sep 07, 2006 8:33 pm
by minerjp
Klemek wrote:What do you think about that small thing almoust in the center? It becomes visible when you set focus depth all the way down.
http://stardustathome.ssl.berkeley.edu/ ... =6591597V1

I've seen calibration movies that look just like that. Probably an inclusion, but sure worth clicking on.

JP

Posted: Thu Sep 07, 2006 8:58 pm
by Mighty Pete
Klemek:


Woops wrong movie. That would be a inclussion. Notice there is two of them. It's up to you if you click on them or not. I just think there glass flaws, Nothing there but at the right angle there appears to be, Like opal.

Re: possible dust track

Posted: Fri Sep 08, 2006 12:12 am
by LCARS
Klemek wrote:What do you think about that small thing almoust in the center? It becomes visible when you set focus depth all the way down.
http://stardustathome.ssl.berkeley.edu/ ... =6591597V1
I say inclusions, there's more than one and they resolve into specs without anything focusing below the surface up to that point.

Re: Probably Bad Focus but...

Posted: Fri Sep 08, 2006 3:26 am
by Wolter
minerjp wrote:10 of 27 so far agree. After 10,000 real movies, this one grabbed my attention, but I do agree its at the bottom of the focus.

http://stardustathome.ssl.berkeley.edu/ ... =5061817V1

What say you all?

JP
Well it starts getting into focus above the surface so it can't be an entry mark. It needs to be scanned again. Bad focus

Posted: Sat Sep 09, 2006 3:58 am
by Darnok

Posted: Sat Sep 09, 2006 6:23 am
by DustBuster
Darnok wrote:It's interesting:

http://stardustathome.ssl.berkeley.edu/ ... =9545029V1

Track?
Hi Darnok.

If you are referring to the small speck that appears below the surface, there is an example in the latest findings update HERE

possible dust track

Posted: Sat Sep 09, 2006 6:26 am
by Klemek
thanks for comments guys

Posted: Sat Sep 09, 2006 7:35 am
by DustBuster
Mighty Pete wrote:Klemek:

That would be a bad focus movie. You are not really entering the glass yet. Interesting though.
I think that response was meant for minerjp, am I right Pete? The FOV from Klemek does go below the surface, but the one referenced by minerjp only comes into focus at the very end of the bars.