jsmaje wrote:What do people think of this one: 9339925V1? Look close to the right edge just below center - it's clearly sub-surface, but is a bit vague because it never fully comes into focus.
The reason for posting it is that of 210 viewings, I am the only one to have marked it so far. Am I being too fussy, or others not fussy enough?
While probably an inclusion, and maybe not marked by others because of this, I will continue to do so until we get some official ruling on this issue (soon would be good!).
A) Your vision and equipment are more than adequate.
B) Your thinking seems logical and correct.
C) Good job!
odave wrote:Hmmm, three instances seems to point away from simple typos. Why would they invert our movies from what was imaged, or from what they see when they review our movies?
...or maybe they're reviewing them in Australia
Congrats odave and jsmaje...those are nice tracks worth considering. I have only 45 events (I'm the slow and steady guy!) all still "indeterminate" except one that changed to not extraterrestrial because it was an inclussion. I'm in awe of those who have 500+ events to their credit! That's exciting. Keep posting the ones that are worth noting. I like looking at them and they help refine my technique.
Also, I think they might rotate the slides so the calibration movies are always rotating around (in other words, there are four movies for each view just rotated 90 degrees)?
Would you believe it ? I saw that movie today I believe. Guess what, I did not mark that spot and here is the reason.
A track below the surface should not get larger as you continue to focus down into the Aerogel, not like that one. It still COULD be a track though. It has a hole in it and I have only seen one with a hole. So...let's wait and see what the evaluation brings.
____________________________________________________________
Definite Track, first one I've ever seen here after 2000 movies: http://stardustathome.ssl.berkeley.edu/ ... =6842789V1
right side.
All clickers should be included in the publications, after all, we are the first 25 out of 6 billion humans to see this piece of useless dirt.
sub212 wrote:Definite Track, first one I've ever seen here after 2000 movies: http://stardustathome.ssl.berkeley.edu/ ... =6842789V1
right side.
All clickers should be included in the publications, after all, we are the first 25 out of 6 billion humans to see this piece of useless dirt.
Nice one, best I've seen too, althought it's still not that good. Have you noticed on all of the best canidates, the focus cuts off at the worst possible time? Just a few more bars down and we'd be able to tell for sure.
And yeah all clickers should be listed, maybe not in the publications, but somewhere on some website at least. And then they should list all the ones that hit no track so we can make fun of them.
Hi, that's my best so far, it looks almoust exacly, like in calibration movie. What do you think about this track slightly under the center? I'm surprised that at this point only 17 people out of 227 clicked on this movie.
Here's a link. http://stardustathome.ssl.berkeley.edu/ ... d=831248V1
What I think - That very faint circle is a small particle that is below the focus . . .there is no track visible leading down to it. So if enough people tag it, it will show up on your events page.
