just a sugg.

Discuss your experiences with and ideas about Stardust@home here.

Moderators: Stardust@home Team, DustMods

Post Reply
garcitaitasister1
Posts: 1
Joined: Fri Nov 09, 2012 11:52 am

just a sugg.

Post by garcitaitasister1 » Mon Nov 19, 2012 9:10 am

FELLOW DUSTERS; I'M FAR SIGHTED, SO I FIND IT HELPFULL TO USE A MAGNIFING GLASS. HAPPY HUNTING

SmithES
Posts: 185
Joined: Sun Apr 17, 2011 5:25 am

Re: just a sugg.

Post by SmithES » Mon Nov 19, 2012 9:48 am

Dear garcitaitasister1, Got a kick out of your post. Don't know how old you are, but I'm 83, and I'm far sighted, too. So to see close up, I got bifocals. But, even with my bifocals, I still need to enlarge the movies. There are at least two easier ways to do that than use a magnifying glass. On my iMAC, I go to "View" in the Menu on desktop and click on "Zoom-in" two or three times to get the movie as large as I need it. The other way is to change my system prefs from 1680 x 1050, to at least 1280 x 800.
However, since I regularly use three browsers for various things, I have dedicated one for Stardust@Home only. Therefore, when I set the size of the movie by using "View" on that one browser, the site opens at the same magnification each time I sign in. So, that is my "default." Use "View" to enlarge the movie. Hope this helps.
Good luck---and think about getting bifocals. They are GREAT!

Evelyn (ERSTRS, SmithES)

jsmaje
Posts: 603
Joined: Tue Aug 15, 2006 8:39 am
Location: Manchester UK

Re: just a sugg.

Post by jsmaje » Thu Nov 22, 2012 2:21 pm

And for those using Microsoft Windows but might be unaware (my version is Windows 7 Premium), you can instantly change screen magnification in 5% steps all the way between 10% (tiny)through the (normal) range of 80-120% up to 1000% (huge), simply by rolling the central mouse wheel whilst holding down the Ctrl key.
Personally I find 85% comfortable for regular web browsing given my particular monitor size and resolution of 1366 x 768, but use 145% for star-dusting (when the whole movie frame fills the screen), increasing to 600% or so for close examination.

As it happens, I’ve been highly & increasingly near-sighted all my life since the age of 8 (eventually reaching 'minus 12' dioptres), but after also recently developing troublesome cataracts have needed artificial lens implants, resulting in quite the opposite situation: perfect far sight yet inability to focus even at reading distance that I'd never previously experienced.
Nevertheless, my ophthalmic surgeon pointed out that I now no longer need to buy expensive bi-, let alone vari-focals, since Amazon & several others do a range of good quality and attractive reading specs between 'plus 1 - 4' or more dioptres for less than £5!
I’m delighted with the two pairs I bought, one at 2.5 for reading/computer use, the other at 4 for things closer. For distance vision (driving, when at a movie etc.) they can be conveniently perched on the end of my nose or tucked into my top pocket. Total cost less than £10, versus my last ‘prescription’ glasses for which I was convinced to pay £640!
Need I say that all this has certainly ‘opened my eyes’?

John

Ronald C. Spencer
Posts: 68
Joined: Thu Sep 21, 2006 11:25 am
Location: Massachusetts

Re: just a sugg.

Post by Ronald C. Spencer » Fri Jan 18, 2013 3:10 pm

That's a great suggestion, I use magnified glasses and that helps out a lot garcitaitasister1 . it's much easier to notice a possible track if one has prescription glasses to deal with. Happy Dusting to everyone! :)

Dr. Ronald C. Spencer

Emeritus Member: The American Astronomical Society
Member: The Division for Planetary Sciences of the AAS
Member: The American Association of Variable Star Observers
Member: The Astronomical Society of the Pacific
Member: The Planetary Society
Astronomer's have Stars in their eye's

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest