scoring

Discuss your experiences with and ideas about Stardust@home here.

Moderators: Stardust@home Team, DustMods

Post Reply
doc
Posts: 14
Joined: Sat Aug 19, 2006 10:18 am

scoring

Post by doc »

One would think that the team would address the frequent objections to scoring which is quite wrong or marginal at best. Such as counting as tracks dark bits of material which are definitely in focus above the surface. Even though many on the team are volunteers there should be better training or a review by peers.
jsmaje
Posts: 616
Joined: Tue Aug 15, 2006 8:39 am
Location: Manchester UK

Re: scoring

Post by jsmaje »

doc wrote:One would think that the team would address the frequent objections to scoring which is quite wrong or marginal at best. Such as counting as tracks dark bits of material which are definitely in focus above the surface. Even though many on the team are volunteers there should be better training or a review by peers.
Doc, I must agree.
I suspect the problem is more that of carelessly-pasted fake CM tracks (as remarked on several times in these forums) rather than wrongly-classified debris.

Meanwhile, whoever may be responsible within the team, I doubt it could have any negative effect on the project in general.
After all, there are more of us than them!
Post Reply