It's been removed from the DB.
Dan
Moderators: Stardust@home Team, DustMods
It's been removed from the DB.
It's been removed from the DB. Thanks for the pointing it out!enokh wrote:This power movie (80 points) another no red markers
http://stardustathome.ssl.berkeley.edu/ ... 0&theY=373
enokh
Yeah, having the coordinate be the last possible number doesn't work, because it's listed as 375 for Y in this case. It's still a good track, so I'll just have this fixed, not removed.caprarom wrote:Dan, 7721145V1 has no "Y" coordinate markers. I believe the feature is at the bottom edge, right of center. It was one of two I'd narrowed it down to, but obviously I chose the wrong one. I liked mine better.
According to my records, 683798V1 is NOT a PM. Are you sure you got the number right? If so, it should be a real movie and thus perhaps a real track. I also don't see it on the Alpha List. Perhaps you have a first find?!caprarom wrote:I don't know if this has already been reported, but 683798V1 appears to be another "inverted" PM. It might well be the mirror image of 2150424V1 which has been discussed previously. Anyway, now I get to start another string of 100 or more PMs to make amends.
The official coordinates of this one are x is 41 and y is 91, so the big black blob at the bottom. Seems to me (through trying to find the "deepest" part that comes into focus), it should be x 90 (or so) and y zero. Would you agree?caprarom wrote:Sorry, Dan, I mistyped the number apparently. The actual PM # is 6083798V1. Apologies.
McAngus wrote:There are indeed many movies totally wrong.
They assign the point only if you indicate the wrong coordinates, ie, the beginning of the track and not the end.
I'll give you my small and incomplete list:
1595231V1;
..................
..................
Moreover, there are many movies that have the reversed jpg.
Thus it happens that by first the track goes in focus, and then the surface.
And we know that this is impossible.
Thanks
McAngus
by McAngus » Wed Sep 26, 2012 3:20 amDanZ wrote:Definitely one we want to eliminate. Please keep reporting! Thank you.McAngus wrote:My 5279368V1 (try 460,100 - 20 pts) is the twin sister of your 2267262V1. Nice!jsmaje wrote:To add to McAngus’s list, 2267262V1 looks like a vertical fiducial track to me, but by clicking on the obviously deepest part near the top margin cost me severely. The team seem to think that the wider circular & surely shallower entry point lower down in the frame is instead the deepest part, and given that it’s rated a relatively easy 20 points resulted in a 65 point penalty!
In other cases, similar to this, if you start from the lower part of the blue bar, the coordinates appear to be right.
There are two possibilities:
1) correct coordinates and jpg reversed;
2) wrong coordinates and jpg mounted correctly.
Where is the truth?
Dan
by laserphil » Wed Sep 26, 2012 5:06 amMcAngus wrote:Thanks Dan,DanZ wrote:Definitely one we want to eliminate. Please keep reporting! Thank you.McAngus wrote: My 5279368V1 (try 460,100 - 20 pts) is the twin sister of your 2267262V1. Nice!
In other cases, similar to this, if you start from the lower part of the blue bar, the coordinates appear to be right.
There are two possibilities:
1) correct coordinates and jpg reversed;
2) wrong coordinates and jpg mounted correctly.
Where is the truth?
Dan
I already know where I have to click.
I'm talking about a different problem.
With great humility I repeat: it happens that first goes in focus the end of the track (the place where we get the points) and then goes in focus the mouth of the track.
And we know that this is impossible.
by DanZ » Tue Oct 30, 2012 5:37 pmlaserphil wrote:Hi McAngus,
Here is the explanation I received about the particular focus movie. It has caused me considerable frustration. Nice to know that it is still around!
LaserphilPostby laserphil » Thu Nov 17, 2011 9:28 pm
Just had a look back at the last time I posted about this track and it is one that has come through from the back of the collector. This was Dan's answer on it from page 18 of this post
Okay, don't be paranoid. This is a "track," but it came up through the aerogel from the OTHER SIDE! (just please don't ask what it is, because right now, we're not sure) Anyway, that's why the terminal end (which is where the "where to click" got placed) is not actually the deepest focus. But of course that causes the confusion you've experienced, which is not really fair and it probably should have never been turned into a PM. Thus we're working on removing it as PM. But there are "cousins" (other PMs made from the original), so if you spot them, please report them here too. Thank you!
____________________DanZ wrote:Sorry I missed the point, thanks for explaining better than me Laserphil!McAngus wrote:Thanks Laserphil,
you have answered my question: "Where is the truth?".
It is evident that, in the 17 months that I was away, I missed a lot of amenities.
McAngus
Dan
Yeah, let's get rid of them!caprarom wrote:No. 3071607V1 is yet another version of that same distressing inverted PM. I got it correct by clicking in the "wrong" place (shallower, bulbous end), rather than the deeper part of the track at the upper edge.